Session: (1052–1081) Immunological Complications of Medical Therapy Poster
1055: Cancer Outcomes in Cancer Patients with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-induced Inflammatory Arthritis Treated with Glucocorticoids: Data from the CanRIO Retrospective Cohort
Vanissa Savarimuthu1, Alexandra Ladouceur2, Oliver Terry1, Janet Roberts3, Janet Pope4, Thomas Appleton4, Sabrina Hoa5, Aurore Fifi-Mah6, Nancy Maltez7, Alexandra Saltman8, Megan Himmel8, Ines Colmegna9, Lindsay Cho10, Emma Schmidt10, Claudie Berger11, Thomas Barnetche12, Lourdes Gonzalez Arreola13, Carrie Ye14, Shahin Jamal15 and Marie Hudson16, 1McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2Department of Rheumatology of McGill University and CHU-Bordeaux, Montréal, QC, Canada, 3Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada, 4University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, 5University of Montreal, Brossard, QC, Canada, 6University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 7The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 8University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 9The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, QC, Canada, 10University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 11RI-MUHC, Montreal, QC, Canada, 12Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France, 13Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 14University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 15Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 16McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
Background/Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of cancer. A drawback of ICI therapy is their off-target effects known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA). Glucocorticoids (GC) are among the first-line treatment for most irAEs, including ICI-IA. However, given the immunosuppressive properties of GC, there is concern that they may blunt the anti-tumor effects of ICI. There is a paucity of evidence on the safety of GC to treat ICI-IA. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of dose, timing of initiation and duration of GC on cancer outcomes in patients with ICI-IA. We hypothesized that highmaximal dose, early initiation and prolonged duration of GC exposure after onset of ICI-IA would be associated with worse outcomes.
Methods: The CanRIO retrospective cohort includes adult subjects with rheumatic irAEs after exposure to ICI, seen at one of 10 rheumatology clinics across Canada between Jan 2013 and Aug 2022, who have had standardized chart data extraction. In this sub-study, participants with de novo ICI-IA (without pre-existing IA), who were exposed to GC within 90 days after onset of IA, and in whom there was at least 3 months of follow up after onset of ICI-IA were analyzed. Data on maximal GC dose (max-GC dose), timing of GC initiation (time-GC) and duration of GC exposure (dur-GC) during the 90 days after the onset of ICI-IA were extracted. Median values for each were determined and used to dichotomize the exposure variables into above and below the median. Kaplan Meier analysis were used to evaluate the association between max-GC, time-GC and dur-GC with progression-free survival and overall survival.
Results: Data on 76 participants with de novo ICI-IA were available for analysis (Table 1). The median max-GC dose was 25 mg daily (interquartile range (IQR) 20-50 mg), median time-GC was 26.5 days (IQR 5-51 days) and median dur-GC was 59.5 days (IQR 30-82 days). Median follow up of the participants was 123.2 weeks. Max-GC dose, time-GC and dur-GC exposure had no association with progression-free and overall survival (Table 2 and Figure 1).
Conclusion: In this study of participants with de novo ICI-IA who were treated with GC, dose of GC, timing of initiation of GC and duration of GC exposure after onset of ICI-IA did not impact tumour outcomes. Although the confidence intervals were wide, our findings provide some reassurance about the safety of short-term GC for the management of ICI-IA. Further studies with larger sample size and longer term follow up are needed to corroborate our results, and additional studies comparing to ICI-IA patients unexposed to GC are needed to optimize management.
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of subjects exposed to glucocorticoid (GC) within 90 days after onset of ICI-IA (N=76).
Table 2: Disease progression and death in GC users by maximal GC dose, time to initiation of GC and duration of GC exposure after ICI-IA onset.
Figure 1: Progression-free and overall survival in weeks after onset of ICI-IA, stratified by the median of maximal dose, time to initiation and duration of GC within 90 days after ICI-IA onset.
V. Savarimuthu: None; A. Ladouceur: None; O. Terry: None; J. Roberts: None; J. Pope: AbbVie, 1, 2; T. Appleton: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, 2, 6, AstraZeneca, 1, 1, Celgene, 1, Eli Lilly, 1, Janssen, 1, Novartis, 1, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 1, 2, 5, 6, Roche, 1, UCB, 1, 2, 6; S. Hoa: Boehringer-Ingelheim, 5; A. Fifi-Mah: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Celltrion, 1, Frenesius-Kabi, 6, Novartis, 1, Otsuka, 1, Pfizer, 5, Sanofi, 1; N. Maltez: None; A. Saltman: None; M. Himmel: None; I. Colmegna: None; L. Cho: None; E. Schmidt: None; C. Berger: None; T. Barnetche: Eli Lilly, 2; L. Gonzalez Arreola: None; C. Ye: None; S. Jamal: AbbVie/Abbott, 1, 6, Eli Lilly, 1, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 1, Merck/MSD, 1, 5, Pfizer, 1, 2, 6, UCB, 1, 2, 6; M. Hudson: AstraZeneca, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 1, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Merck, 6, UCB, 5.