University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT, United States
Disclosure information not submitted.
Madeline O'Sullivan1, Grant Cannon1, Brian Sauer2, Jorge Rojas Jr3, Gary Kunkel4, Jessica A Walsh5, Punyasha Roul6, Bryant England6, Ted R Mikuls7, Joshua Baker8 and Tawnie Braaten4, 1University of Utah and Salt Lake City VA, Salt Lake City, UT, 2Salt Lake City VA/University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 3Puget Sound VA and University of Utah, Seattle, WA, 4University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 5Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Health and University of Utah Health, Division of Rheumatology, Salt Lake City, UT, 6University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 7Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 8University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Background/Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used to treat multiple cancers with increasing frequency and have led to improved survival. However, there is limited data on the use of ICIs in patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease, specifically rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as these patients were excluded from most clinical trials. There is concern that RA patients may experience higher mortality with ICI treatment. The objective of this investigation was to compare all-cause and cause-specific mortality following ICI treatment in patients with and without pre-existing RA in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).
Methods: This analysis employed data from the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) for demographic and pharmacy information, VA Central Cancer Registry for cancer diagnosis, Death Ascertainment File (DAF) for all-cause mortality rates, and National Death Index (NDI) for cause of death. We identified Veterans with RA in the VHA with two ICD codes at least 30 days apart, at least one ICD code from a rheumatologist, and treatment with a disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug. Each RA case was matched up to 10:1 based on year of birth, sex, and year of VHA enrollment to Veterans without RA. RA and non-RA patients receiving ICI therapy between 6/6/2011 and 2/14/2023 were identified.All-cause mortality up to 4/30/2023 was obtained from the DAF and cause specific mortality from NDI through 12/31/2019. Demographic, ICI treatment, and cancer type were compared using student t-test or Chi square. Survival from the time of ICI initiation was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and log rank testing.
Results: The cohort of Veterans with RA included 73,677 patients matched to 727,627 controls. There were 301 (0.41%) among the RA patients and 2,114 (0.29%) among the non-RA controls treated with an ICI. There were no differences in demographics, smoking status, first ICI drug, or cancer diagnosis between these groups at the time of initial ICI infusion (Table 1). The Veterans were majority white, non-Hispanic, male, and current or former smokers. Lung cancer was the most common malignancy type and pembrolizumab was used most frequently as the first ICI in both groups. Both groups had high mortality with one-year survival 51.2% [45.2% - 56.7%] vs. 54.5% [45.3% - 56.7%] and two-year survival 35.0% [29.3% - 40.7%] vs. 37.5% [35.2% - 39.7%] in the RA and non-RA groups, respectively. There was no significant survival difference between the groups (p=0.29)(Figure 1). The NDI cause of death was similar in both groups (p=0.96) with the most common being neoplasm in 91.9% and 91.2% of patients, respectively (Table 2). Deaths due to infection were rare in both groups (1.2%).
Conclusion: Veterans with pre-existing RA who received ICIs for cancer did not experience excess mortality or differences in cause of death compared to Veterans without RA receiving ICI treatment. These preliminary data suggest that a diagnosis of RA alone should not serve as a contraindication to ICI therapy in the context of comorbid cancer.
Table 1. Demographic and clinical information of RA and non-RA patients at time of first immune checkpoint inhibitor infusion
Table 2. Specific cause of death from the National Death Index in RA patients treated with ICIs among those with available data from NDI
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis after first ICI infusion
M. O'Sullivan: None; G. Cannon: None; B. Sauer: None; J. Rojas Jr: None; G. Kunkel: None; J. Walsh: AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Janssen, 2, Merck, 5, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2; P. Roul: None; B. England: Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 5; T. Mikuls: Elsevier, 9, Horizon Therapeutics, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, Sanofi, 2, UCB Pharma, 2, Wolters Kluwer Health (UpToDate), 9; J. Baker: CorEvitas, 2, Cumberland Pharma, 2, Horizon Pharmaceuticals, 5; T. Braaten: None.