Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska Unversity Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden Stockholm, Sweden
Disclosure information not submitted.
Kittikorn Wangriatisak1, Francesca Faustini2, Charlotte de Vries3, Ravi Kumar Sharma4, Caroline Grönwall5, Prapaporn Pisitkun6, Patchanee Chootong7, Vivianne Malmström5 and Iva Gunnarsson8, 1Department of Clinical Microbiology and Applied Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Thailand ; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Sweden; Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 2Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Sweden; Medicine Unit Dermatology, Gastroenterology, Rheumatology; unit of Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden, 3Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Sweden; Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 4Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 5Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 6Division of Allergy Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bankok, Thailand, 7Department of Clinical Microbiology and Applied Technology, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand, 8Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Sweden; Medicine Unit Dermatology, Gastroenterology, Rheumatology; unit of Rheumatology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden
Background/Purpose: Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most severe manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), which is characterized by abnormal B-cell activation and their subsequent differentiation into autoreactive plasma blasts/cells. The heterogeneity of autoreactive B cell subsets and their contribution to the pathogenesis of LN are not well elucidated.
Methods: Thirty-five SLE patients, including twenty-eight with positive anti-dsDNA antibodies (80%), and fifteen healthy controls were recruited in this study. Data are represented as median and interquartile range (IQR). To identify DNA-reactive B cells, a surrogate peptide (DWEYSVWLSN) that serves as dsDNA mimotope was used, as previously shown (Jacobi, Annett M et al. 2009 and Wangriatisak, Kittikorn et al. 2021). The phenotype of peripheral B cell subsets (SLE, n = 37 from 35 patients and HCs, n = 15) and DNA-reactive B cells (SLE, n = 10 and HCs, n = 6) was analyzed by spectral flow cytometry. Correlations between different B-cell subsets and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score, clinical manifestations, and laboratory parameters were assessed.
Results: In SLE patients, the median SLEDAI-2K score was 9 (4-17), median age and disease duration were 34 (28-46) and 9 (1.5-13.0), respectively. Twenty-one patients presented with lupus nephritis (LN), with proliferative (class III, n = 3 and class IV, n = 4), membranous (class V, n = 7) and mixed histological patterns (class III & V, n = 5 and class IV & V, n = 2). Phenotypic analyses showed an expansion of circulating activated naïve (aNAV: CD11c+CD21-CD27-IgD+, p < 0.01), double negative 2 B cells (DN2: CD11c+CD21-CD27-IgD-, p < 0.05) and plasmablasts (PB: CD27hiCD38hi, p < 0.05) in LN patients, especially in class V, compared to non-LN and age-matched HCs. Intriguingly, an upregulation of CD71, as well as a downregulation of CD95, was observed on both DN2 and PB from patients with LN. Further analysis showed that expansion of DNA-reactive B cells was observed in LN patients (median (IQR): 0.13% (0.095-0.160)) compared with non-LN patients (median (IQR): 0.056% (0.042-0.070), p < 0.05). Surprisingly, the majority of these autoreactive cells were mostly represented by an activated naïve phenotype (CD11c+CXCD5-CD21-), which was more frequent in patients with LN. The percentage of aNAV B cells were positively associated with DN2 (r = 0.567, p = 0.0003) and PB (r = 0.498, p = 0.002), especially in patients with LN. These expanded aNAV, DN2 and PB showed a significant positive correlation with the SLEDAI-2K index, and were inversely correlated with C3 and C4 levels in LN patients. Furthermore, DN2 and aNAV B cells were expanded in anti-dsDNA positive patients, while a lower frequency of such cells was found in anti-Smith positive patients.
Conclusion: Our data show that aNAV B cells display autoreactivity to dsDNA. The cooperation between these cells and DN2 and PB might be involved in the generation of anti-dsDNA antibody in LN which proceed of these B cell responses might via the extrafollicular pathway.
K. Wangriatisak: None; F. Faustini: None; C. de Vries: None; R. Kumar Sharma: None; C. Grönwall: None; P. Pisitkun: None; P. Chootong: None; V. Malmström: Eli Lilly, 1, Janssen, 5, ONO, 1, Pfizer, 5; I. Gunnarsson: None.